OCZSSD2-1SLD30G OCZ, It’s fast. Solid return..
| Overall Rating | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
It’s fast. Solid return for money spent.
Pros: It’s power consumption is lower. It fit into my laptop case just fine. I would say boot speed is faster than a Raptor. I have not experienced any of the stutters or delays associated with these sorts of drives at this price point.
Cons: It’s a little pricey for 30GB.
Other Thoughts: I took an extra 5 minutes and formatted it according to the OCZ recommendations prior to installing XP Pro. I have experienced the random-write stutter issues on other SSD’s I have, so I know what to look for. I am not experiencing these issues with this drive. It did not seem to like installation from a SATA-based CD-ROM, so I used an IDE-based one with no problem. Could be the SSD, could be the Optical drive. I don’t know. I suspect it’s my make and model of SATA CD/DVD drive.
I don’t subscribe to synthetic benchmarks because they are, well, synthetic. What I can tell you is that it does not stutter or lock up for brief periods of time. XP Pro installed quickly-much faster than a 7200RPM drive. SP3 installed quickly.
However, I doubt this drive could keep up with a sustained write if pitted against a decent 7.2K or 10K drive.
Finally, I suggest you follow the additional SSD tips such as disabling indexing, system restore, using appropriate cache settings, and such. If you have a second mechanical drive you should use that drive for your page file. Don’t defragment SSD’s, regardless of how much your defragmenter nags you to. A few extra minutes of work upfront will be repaid with a much quicker SSD down the road.
Update (2/6/2012): I also found some auctions for this item here.
The featured review for this product, OCZ Technology 30 GB Solid Series SATA 2.5 Inch Solid State Drive SSD OCZSSD2-1SLD30G Electronics, was written by Steve S..
The average rating for this item is out of 5 stars, according to 3 reviews.
- Related posts on apple ssd
- Macbook Pro Core i5 Intel SSD 160GB
- Who says a Mac does not crash?
- OWC Announces New Mercury Extreme Pro 40GB SSD As Most Affordable …
- Related posts on hard drive
- Dell Dj Hard Drive Replacement | DJfanatic
- How to recover data from a usb hard drive ยป OnlyHardwareBlog
- Intel imac hard drive upgrade from Burtonbytes
- Related posts on mac ssd
- Solid State Drive (SSD) Tercepat OWC Mercury Extreme Pro untuk …
- Refurbished MacBook G0FV0LL/A
- Setting SSD instead of HDD Icon on OS X | Brian Klug: Internet …
Related posts:
- Amerock BP1950-ORB Solid, Fast and complete
- S1000U SimpleTech by, Rugged fast and inexpensive
- AMD AD775ZWCGHBOX Athlon, VERY fast Black Edition..
- SanDisk SDSDQY-8192-A11M, Holy Crap this card is FAST!
- Lexmark C5220KS Return, Product Description
Tags: apple ssd, hard drive, mac ssd, osx ssd, sata, ssd
Posted on: September 9, 2010
Filed under: Reviews


Reviews (3)
JLDET5
July 25th, 2010 at 4:15 am
Pretty good
I’m using this as a secondary drive and secondary boot drive. No problems and seems pretty good. I’m going to try their faster Vertex performance version as a primary very soon!
Anonymous
August 18th, 2010 at 1:12 pm
Solid Improvement For An Aging OSX Apple MacBook
This low-end ‘value’ SSD from OCZ is markedly fast compared to the stock hard drive my 1st-generation MacBook came with. It’s performed flawlessly running OS X Leopard 10.5 the past few months, and I consider an SSD to be the singularly smartest computer upgrade I’ve ever done. My Mac starts up, launches and switches apps, shuts down in a *fraction* of the time. I’ve never detected any of the ’stuttering’ or ‘pausing’ Windows XP users moan about with these original JMicron controller based drives: OSX responds admirably. Given that most Macs - until rather recently - have SATA I speed controller chips, buying the absolute latest, greatest, fastest SATA II SSD may be overkill anyways. However, I do think my NEXT SSD will decidedly be an OCZ *Vertex* drive two-tiers up from the Solid Series.
Steve S.
August 20th, 2010 at 5:13 pm
It’s fast. Solid return for money spent.
Rated 4 stars.
Leave a reply