Cisco-Linksys WRVS4400N, Terrible Product. Terrible..
| Overall Rating | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Terrible Product. Terrible Company.
I should have known better. I’m a geek (I’ve owned more than 20 computers/servers in my >10 years as a software engineer and I’ve setup >10 wired/wireless networks for friends and family), so when I read all of the bad reviews on this product, I just figured it was people who couldn’t figure out what they’re doing. I was wrong, so wrong. The WRVS4400N is totally worthless - don’t make the same mistake as I - BUY A DIFFERENT ROUTER.
The problem is that every 24 hours or 36 hours (on the exact second) this router stops sharing the internet connections to all computers on the network. It must them be unplugged or rebooted via the web interface and then the problem goes away. So far their tech support has been unable to resolve the problem they keep sending me new routers. After this last one, they told me there is nothing more they can do and it will have to be reported as an issue to their product development team. My internet connection is fine as evidenced by plugging in a laptop when the router fails and they have reported no compatibility issues with my cable modem. And furthermore other people are experiencing the exact same problem.
This router does offer a great set of features for the price, but be careful - they’re implemented poorly. So you’ll likely turn them off.
The IPS (special security features that this router offers) features are worthless - if you want to FTP anything, you’ll need to turn them off. And even with them off, I still can’t connect to several of the FTP servers that I routinely connect to, which I could with my last router - for example Google Base FTP servers and Yahoo’s webhosting accounts.
The QoS (quality of service) features are extremely hard to configure and there is NO documentation on line, include with the product or in the help section of the administration tool, which explains how to actually configure it.
The range of the N wireless network isn’t very impressive. It’s only slightly better than the G router from Linksys that it replaced. Both routers were placed in the same spot in my basement.
I haven’t tried the VPN connectivity yet, but you’re only limited to 5 clients connecting, which is a limitation that’s not published on this product description, nor easy to find on Linksys’s site.
Now, I’ve been a long time buyer and recommender of Linksys products, but in the last two years their product quality has plummeted as evidenced by the ratings they get her on Amazon. They keep sending me these survey’s every time I contact their tech support and I share these same complaints, but they don’t get any better. If anything they’re getting worse.
Linksys’s phone technical support is horrible. This unit isn’t serviced by the “home” area of Linksys’s tech-support staff, you must go through the “business” area and their level 1 support staff aren’t even trained, so you go right to their level 2 support, which you’d think would mean you’d get good support, but not from Linksys. They have no idea how to solve problems with this router. Several of the tech support people have given up and made excuses to get off the phone - my favorite was to reapply the same version of the router’s firmware, waste an hour reconfiguring it, and then wait 24-36 hours to see if the problem came back; and sure enough it did.
Linksys’s phone customer support is horrible. After my last tech support tech’s manager determined that I have yet another defective router and I should get a new one, I was transferred to their customer service department so that they could process an RMA. It took them 43 minutes to process the RMA. The customer service person, who could barely speak english, said he had to read everyone of the case notes in order to process an RMA. Then it took 24 minutes to get transferred to his supervisor to complain about him.
So to reiterate my review: While this router looks like a great set of features for great price, you’ll need to turn off much of those features to be able to FTP, and you’ll need to reboot your router every 24-36 hours if you want it to router internet service to other computers on your network. And if you have to call tech support or customer support, you’ll be in for some horrible experience. So don’t make the same mistake as I did. Don’t buy this router.
Update (2/7/2012): I also found some auctions for this item here.
The featured review for this product, Cisco-Linksys WRVS4400N Wireless-N Gigabit Security Router - VPN v2.0 Electronics, was written by Java Geek.
The average rating for this item is out of 5 stars, according to 3 reviews.
- Related posts on 80211n
- APPLE 13-inch MacBook (laptop)- Intel 2.4GHz Intel Core 2 Duo, 4GB …
- $149.99 – NETGEAR WNDR3700-100NAS IEEE 802.11n Draft 2.0 Rangemax …
- TRENDnet ProView Wireless N Internet Camera TV-IP512WN (802.11n …
- Related posts on awesome router
- cisco-linksys e2000 advanced wireless-n router
- !Review D-Link DIR-655 Extreme
- Related posts on bad
- Mock, Paper, Scissors » Blog Archive » Bad Ads, cont.
Related posts:
- Cisco-Linksys WRVS4400N, Terrible Product. Terrible..
- Cisco-Linksys WRT160N-RM, Great Router… with DD-WRT..
- Cisco-Linksys WMP54GS, Crummy tech support and..
- Cisco-Linksys BEFSR81, A must have for those who..
- Cisco-Linksys WRT54G2, Open NAT for xbox 360!
Tags: 80211n, awesome router, bad, bad firmware, cisco, costa rica, firmware, home networking, junk, linksys, linksys wrvs4400n wireless router vpn, no ssl forwarding, poor support, pre-n, router, unreliable, vpn, wireless, wireless router, wrvs4400n
Posted on: July 13, 2010
Filed under: Reviews


Reviews (3)
Omni
June 7th, 2010 at 5:40 am
WRVS4400n LOCKS UP.
We have a small office network, and bought this router mainly for Internet access. The router will crash, be / get it up to several times per week and must be restored to shut down. This process can take 2-3 attempts before you get back up. The main problem is the router is unreliable and completely useless in our application. We spent many hours squandered in an attempt to shoot this problem effort and believe it can only be a design flaw in the product. We are the relocation of the dumpster and search for a higher quality product from another manufacturer.
Tritius
June 29th, 2010 at 12:47 am
Poor performances - now improved
==================================================================
REVIEW UPDATE
- Nov 13 2007 -
Linksys released on Oct.30 2007 a new firmware (ver 1.01.13).
I updated the router immediately, and after 15 days I could say that I noticed much more system stability.
Configuration interface has been deeply modified also to implement new functionalities (like IP address pre-assignation).
Many bugs has been fixed, some still exists.
Menues are still confusing sometimes and help text have to been improved.
Wish that these matter will be kept in consideration for next firmware release.
Wireless seems to be more stable even if performances are not 100% as expected.
This product has been greatly improved, but still Linksys
have to do some work to release a better firmware version.
=======================================================================
PREVIOUS REVIEW
- June 28 2007 -
After one week of testing in my home network in conjunctoin with LinkSys AM200 ADSL modem I would like to report this way:
Firmware version: 1.00.13
PROS: Good firewall performances, uptime, gigabit switch, nice looking, excellent phone technical support, tiny wall AC adapter.
CONS: Very poor and instable Wireless “G” performances, dramatic Wireless area reduction in comparison with my old D-LINK, impossible to preassign IP addresses, high-pitched continuous noise, limited MAC filtering (just 20 entries), heat, web interface hangs, front LEDs are useless if you don’t watch them just in front, web interface sometime confusing or -at least- not clear.
This is sold as a “professional” WiFi router, so customers are expecting
adequate performances.
I wish that serious guys like Linksys will suddenly fix the major cons, WiFi “G” performances and IP pre-assign in particular.
Otherwise a much cheaper “home” product will work absolutely better at one third of the cost.
Java Geek
July 3rd, 2010 at 12:50 am
Terrible Product. Terrible Company.
Rated 1 stars.
Leave a reply